Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement), 2004: 4724
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dos Santos, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Passos-Coelho, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dos Santos, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Passos-Coelho, J. L.

Abstract

Clinical outcome of germ cell cancer patients (pts) treated with high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (HDC) –a single center experience

E. G. Dos Santos, F. Leal-Da-costa, N. Miranda, A. Machado, A. Guimaraes, I. Ferreira, M. Abecasis and J. L. Passos-Coelho

Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, IPOFG, CROL, SA, Lisbon, Portugal

4724

Background: Pts with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) "poor prognosis" disease achieve only a 41% 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) with standard chemotherapy. Pts who do not achieve a complete remission with BEP chemotherapy or who relapse after such treatment have a still worse prognosis. The clinical impact of HDC in such pts is still unclear. Methods: Pts with germ cell cancer with IGCCCCG "poor prognosis" disease at diagnosis (or, earlier, with Indiana group C) or with recurrent or refractory (i.e., less than marker negative partial remission) disease after initial BEP chemotherapy were eligible for HDC. Results: Between June 1996 and April 2003, 18 pts underwent one (13 pts) or two (5 pts) cycles of HDC with ICE (ifosfamide 10g/m2, carboplatin 1,500mg/m2 and etoposide 2,400mg/m2); 17 pts), or etoposide (1500mg/m2) plus thiotepa (900 mg/m2); 1 pt), in 6 pts as consolidation after BEP and in 12 pts for recurrent disease (7 pts) or refractoriness to BEP (5 pts). In the consolidation group (6 pts), with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10–72 months), there are no events. Thus the PFS and overall survival (OS) at 3.5 years is 100%. In contrast, with a median follow-up of 18 months, the median PFS and OS for pts with recurrent or refractory disease subgroup are 4 months (0–40+) and 18 months (4–40+), respectively. In this subgroup, 10 pts relapsed by 8 months post-HDC and only 2 are progression-free at 20 and 40 months. Conclusions: Despite the small number of pts and short follow-up, these results compare at least as favorably to the outcome obtained with standard chemotherapy in pts with "poor prognosis" at diagnosis. In contrast the outcome of pts with recurrent or refractory disease after initial BEP chemotherapy are not better than those obtained with standard salvage chemotherapy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online