Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement), 2004: 502
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hannemann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van de Vijver, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hannemann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van de Vijver, M.

Abstract

Changes in gene expression profiling due to primary chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

J. Hannemann, H. M. Oosterkamp, C. A. J. Bosch, C. Loo, A. Witteveen, A. Velds, E. J. T. H. Rutgers, S. Rodenhuis and M. Van de Vijver

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

502

Introduction: It is currently not possible to predict sensitivity of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to specific drugs. This study was designed to identify gene expression patterns in LABC that can predict response to neoadjuvant therapy with Adriamycine (60 mg/m2) and Cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) (AC); or Adriamycine (50 mg/m2) and Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) (AD). Methods: We started a phase III trial for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, randomizing between 6 courses of AC or 6 courses AD. Total RNA was isolated from a 14 G core needle biopsy obtained before treatment. All patients underwent surgery after completing chemotherapy. RNA was isolated from any remaining tumor. Amplified mRNA was hybridized on human 18k cDNA microarrays (NKI microarray facility). Supervised and unsupervised classifications were used to analyze differences between gene expression before and after treatment and to correlate expression profiles with response to the chemotherapy. Results: 62 patients with LABC have been randomized in the study. Good quality RNA from tissue with more than 50% tumor cells was obtained from 46 biopsies and from 18 tumors after chemotherapy. Data from 49 patients were included in the analysis: 25 from the AC arm, 24 from the AD arm. Using two-dimensional unsupervised hierarchical clustering, the tumor and biopsy clustered together in almost all cases when no response to chemotherapy was observed. When partial or complete remission was observed, the untreated biopsy specimens and the tumors after treatment clustered together more closely than the specimen obtained from individual patients before and after treatment. Using 9-fold cross-validation on the whole dataset containing 46 biopsies before and 18 specimen after treatment, an optimal number of 30 genes could be identified to distinguish between specimen before and after treatment with an average performance of 91%. Discussion: When breast carcinomas do not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, there are no large alterations in the gene expression pattern. When tumors respond, a gene expression pattern of 30 genes distinguishes tumors before and after therapy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online