Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement), 2004: 516
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asmar, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Asmar, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S.

Abstract

A planned comparison of menopausal symptoms during the first year in 1,000 patients receiving either exemestane or tamoxifen in a double-blind adjuvant hormonal study

L. Asmar, J. Cantrell, S. J. Vukelja, J. E. Pippen, J. O'Shaughnessy, J. L. Blum, R. J. Brooks, S. Mull, H. Guo and S. Jones

US Oncology Research, Inc, Houston, TX

516

Background: We assessed 10 menopausal symptoms at baseline and every 3 months during the first year of an ongoing randomized Phase III trial comparing relapse-free survival of postmenopausal women with receptor positive, early breast cancer treated with exemestane (an aromatase inactivator) or tamoxifen for 5 years. Methods: Symptoms were assessed by each patient as none, mild, moderate, or severe with more detail used to establish a "hot flash score". The median age of 997 evaluable pts was 65 years (range, 40–90). The symptoms were examined statistically by analysis of variance with repeated measurement design. Results: Vaginal dryness (p=0.0021) and bone/muscle aches (p<0.001) were worse in pts receiving exemestane while vaginal discharge was more common (p<0.001) in pts receiving tamoxifen. Most symptoms were mild or moderate and many pts recorded symptoms prior to the start of treatment (e.g. only 27% of pts recorded "none" for "low energy"). Based on the current sample size of 997 pts, there are no significant differences between the 2 treatments with respect to vaginal bleeding, mood alteration, impaired word finding, low energy, and hot flashes. Conclusion: This analysis is based on review of 3740 forms and by the time of the ASCO meeting, an analysis based on >4500 forms will be presented. Supported by Pfizer, New York, NY, USA



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 

Author Disclosure
Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration

Pfizer Pfizer Pfizer

Abstract presentation from the 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online