Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement), 2004: 519
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semiglazov, V. F.
Right arrow Articles by Berstein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Semiglazov, V. F.
Right arrow Articles by Berstein, L.

Abstract

The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy vs chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with ER- positive breast cancer

V. F. Semiglazov, V. Semiglazov, V. Ivanov, A. Bozhok, E. Ziltsova, R. Paltuev, G. Dashian, A. Kletzel, E. Topuzov and L. Berstein

N.N. Petrov Research Institute of oncology, St Petersberg, Russian Federation

519

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or hormonal therapy (HT) is being used increasingly to downstage locally advanced and large operable breast cancer. Following this treatment, inoperable breast cancer often becomes fully resectable, and tumors requiring mastectomy may be successfully removed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Patient selection is important to optimize neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), especially in elderly postmenopausal women with co-morbid conditions. Methods: Between March 1998 and March 2003, 121 postmenopausal (PM) women with ER(+) and/or PgR(+) breast cancer (BC) T2N1–2, T3N0–1, T4N0M0 assigned NAT with either CT Dox 60 mg/m2 + Pac 200 mg/m2, every 3 weeks, 4 cycles, n=62 patients (pts), or HT with aromatase inhibitors, anastrazole 1 mg, n = 30 pts, 3 months). The primary endpoint was to compare overall objective response (OR) determined by clinical (palpation) and mammogr. Secondary endpoint was the number of pts who qualified for BCS + radiotherapy (50 Gy for 25 fractions). Results: Table 1.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
OR rate (clinical and mammogr.) was statistically similar ( p > 0.05 ) in the CT and anastrazole groups. Tendency to more BCS took place in the anastrozol arm that in the CT arm ( 37.9 % vs 20.6 % p=0.054). Local recurrence rate were similar for pts receiving CT or HT (3,2 % and 3,4%, at 34 months median follow up ). In CT arm the most frequent grade III/IV toxicity was alopecia ( 79.3 5 ), neutropenia ( 43.1 %), cardiotoxicity (6.8 %), diarrhea (1.7%). HT was well tolerated. The most commonly adverse events were hot flushes (23.3%), vaginal discharge (6.6%), musculosskeletal disorders (1.7%). Conclusions: NAHT with aromatase inhibitors (anastrazole) is a reasonable alternative to CT for PM women with ER and/or PgR - positive cancer in clinical situation where the low toxicity of the regimen is considered an advantage, for example, for women over 70.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online