Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement), 2004: 8562
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biswas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Biswas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, L.

Abstract

Challenges in management of advanced neuroblastoma: Experience at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

G. Biswas, P. Kurkure, S. Banavali, S. Achrekar, P. Kulkarni, R. Bhagwat and L. Sharma

TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MUMBAI, India

8562

Background: Poor therapeutic response in advanced neuroblastoma prompted us to implement St. Jude's Protocol [NB - 84, TMH NB-2] since 1987 and Ifosfamide based chemotherapy [ICE, TMH NB-3] since 1996 with the aim to improve survival rate with manageable toxicities.Methods: 128 cases of neuroblastoma from 1987 to 2000 were analysed. In infants (n = 29) median age at presentation 9 months, duration of symptoms 60 days, M: F:: 1.6: 1. An asymptomatic abdominal mass (62%) as a commonest presenting symptom & primary site (62.1%). Stage III(17), IV(1) received 6 # of adriamycin & cyclophosphamide or 1 -2 # of adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, Cisplatin & Etoposide. Surgery considered after 3/6 # or 1/2# of chemotherapy respectively. In children > l year (n=99) median age at presentation 48 months, duration of symptoms 60 days, M: F:: 1.3: 1. Commonest presenting symptom as fever (51%) & primary site as abdomen (66.7%). Stage IIB(3),III(30), IV(60) received 1cycle of TMH NB-2 as induction followed by either 2# of TMH NB-2 or 4 # TMH NB-3 as consolidation. In StageIII surgery offered after induction, whereas in stageIV at the end of consolidation. Radiotherapy or 131I MIBG treatment was given where surgery not feasible or in R1 resection. ABMT was offered for gross residual disease when economically feasible & 13 Cis Retinoic acid for minimal residual disease in stage IV. Results: Infantile group 62% constituted intermediate risk (stage III, IV). Overall response (CR+VGPR+PR) to therapy was 97%. OS is 75.06%. 58% are alive & disease free at a median follow-up of 42.9 months. In children>1year 94% constituted high risk (IIB, III, IV).74% showed response to therapy. OS is 54.31%. 18.6 % are alive & disease free at a median follow up of 14.9 months. Conclusions: High risk patients remains an area of concern in our setting. Proper risk stratification has not been possible at our center & remains the main constraint in tailoring therapy. Innovative & aggressive treatment strategies to improve survival & response rates now remains a need of time.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online