Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 2577
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kokhaei, P.
Right arrow Articles by Mellstedt, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kokhaei, P.
Right arrow Articles by Mellstedt, H.

Abstract

Telomerase - a tumor antigen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) induces spontaneously autologous leukemia specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes

P. Kokhaei, M. Palma, L. Hansson, A. Ã-sterborg, A. Choudhury and H. Mellstedt

Karolinska Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden

2577

Background: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is the catalytic domain of the functional telomerase complex, which expression is absent and/or transient in most normal human adult cells, but high in most tumor cells. Almost 90% of human tumors display high levels of telomerase expression, implying the possibility of using hTERT as a target for cancer immunotherapy. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 26 B-CLL pts were tested for telomerase expression by RT-PCR. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) were generated from PBMC of 4 telomerase positive and 2 telomerase-negative CLL patients. DC were pulsed with a 16 mer amino acid long peptide from hTERT and with a RAS peptide as control. To assess telomerase-specific T cells, IFN-{gamma} production (ELISPOT), 3H thymidine incorporation, MHC blocking, and cytotoxicity assays were used. Results: PCR showed that hTERT was expressed in 13 out of 26 pts. Among the 13 telomerase-positive pts, 4 were selected for hTERT-specific CTL expansion. In all 4 pts DC pulsed with hTERT peptide could generate CTL against the autologous leukemic cells upon two rounds of restimulation with a specific lysis of 58±12% (mean± SEM). The corresponding figures for Ras stimulated T cells were15±3.5% lysis (p<0.025). In two telomerase-negative pts telomerase specific CTLs recognizing the autologous leukemic B cells could not be expanded. Telomerase expanded T cells induced 1.8± 0.2% lysis of tumor B cells and the control Ras peptide 1.7 ± 1% lysis. Comparing lytic capacity of telomerase positive and negative pts was statistically significant (p<0.027). In 2 out of 4 pts a proliferative response against hTERT was noted in fresh T cells. No restimulation was done. MHC class I and MHC class II blocking revealed that the proliferative response was both MHC I and MHC II-dependent. No INF-{gamma} production was detected in fresh isolated T cells stimulated once with the peptide. Conclusion: Our data show that CLL pts with telomerase positive leukemic cells have spontaneously occurring telomerase specific T cells able to lyse the leukemic cells. The results indicate that telomerase might be a valid target structure for vaccine development in CLL.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online