Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 2580
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunsvig, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gaudernack, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brunsvig, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Gaudernack, G.

Abstract

A phase I/II study of telomerase peptide vaccination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

P. F. Brunsvig, M. K. Gjertsen, G. Kvalheim, S. Aamdal, C. J. Markowski-Grimsrud, I. Sve, M. Dyrhaug, S. Trachsel, M. Møller, J. Eriksen and G. Gaudernack

The Norwegian Radium Hosp, Univ of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; GemVax AS, Oslo, Norway; GemVax AS, Oslo, Norway

2580

Background: A phase I/II study was conducted to investigate the safety, tolerability and clinical response to vaccination with a combination of telomerase peptides GV1001 (hTERT: 611–626) and HR2822 (hTERT: 540–548).Methods: Twenty-six patients with non-small cell lung cancerreceived intradermal administrations of either 112 µg or 560 µg GV1001 in combination with 68.4 µg HR2822 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor. The treatment period was ten weeks. Booster vaccinations with 560 µg GV1001 were offered as follow-up. Monitoring of blood samples, clinical examination and radiological staging were performed regularly. Immune responses were measured as delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reaction and in vitro T-cell proliferation. Bone marrow function was monitored in long time survivors. Our regional medical research ethics committee has approved the study and signed informed consent was obtained in all subjects. Results: The treatment was well tolerated with minor side effects. Immune responses against GV1001 were detected in 11 of 24 evaluable patients during the primary regimen and in an additional two patients following booster injections. Two patients responded to HR2822. Cloned GV1001-specific CD4+ T cells displayed a Th1 cytokine profile and recognized autologous antigen presenting cells pulsed with recombinant telomerase protein. No bone marrow toxicities were observed in long time survivors with immune responses. A complete tumor response was observed in one patient who developed GV1001-specific cytotoxic T cells that could be cloned from peripheral blood. Conclusions: Telomerase vaccination of patients with advanced treatment resistant NSCL cancer is feasible and results in potentially beneficial immune responses in about 50% of vaccinated patients.


Author Disclosure
Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration

GemVax GemVax

Abstract presentation from the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online