Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 4218
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takayama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Niitsu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Takayama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Niitsu, Y.

Abstract

Phase I/II study of docetaxel, CDDP and S-1 in unresectable advanced gastric cancer

T. Takayama, Y. Sato, T. Okamoto, T. Sagawa, T. Abe, H. Ihara, H. Nagashima, J. Kato and Y. Niitsu

Sapporo Medcl Univ, Sapporo, Japan

4218

Purpose: Recently it has been reported that the combination of docetaxel, CDDP and 5-FU was effective in advanced gastric cancer. It has also been reported that S-1, a new oral fluorinated pyrimidine compound consisting of tegafur, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate, was significantly more effective as compared to 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a phase I/II study of the combination of docetaxel, CDDP and S-1 in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Eligibility criteria were pathologically proven unresectable gastric cancer (stage IIIb - IV), PS 0 - 1, normal organ functions, and no prior treatment. Doses of S-1 (80mg/m2, d 1 - 14) and CDDP (60 mg/m2, d 8) were fixed. Docetaxel (d 8) was dose-escalated from 60mg/m2 (level 1) to 70 mg/m2 (level 2), and then 80mg/m2 (level 3). This treatment was repeated more than 3 times every 3 wks. Patients who achieved down staging underwent surgical resection. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled. Toxicity and efficacy data of all the patients are available. At level 1 (n=3), no patient developed grade 3/4 toxicity. At level 2 (n=5), two patients developed grade 4 neutropenia, and one patient developed grade 3 nausea /vomiting. At level 3 (n=3), two patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 nausea/vomiting. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were neutropenia and nausea /vomiting. Recommended dose (RD) was determined as docetaxel 60mg/m2 (level 1). 91% of the patients achieved objective response consisting of 1 complete response and 9 partial responses, and only 1 patient showed disease stabilization. Three out of the 10 patients who achieved objective response underwent down staging, and received subsequent gastrectomy. On the other hand, 5 out of the 7 patients, who did not undergo down staging, have survived, and currently survival time is 10 - 16 months (median 14). One out of the 3 patients who received gastrectomy achieved complete response that was proven by histological examination. All the patients who received gastrectomy have survived, and currently survival time is 15 - 23 months (median 18). Conclusion: RD of this regimen was determined to be level 1. Our regimen is feasible and very effective with a high response rate (91%).

No significant financial relationships to disclose.






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online