Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 516
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, T. M.

Abstract

Radiation after lumpectomy for DCIS to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer: A population-based study

N. N. Baxter, B. A. Virnig, S. B. Durham and T. M. Tuttle

Univ of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

516

Background: Although randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of radiation (RT) in reducing the risk of breast cancer after lumpectomy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), the use of RT in the population remains relatively low. This study was designed to determine the effectiveness of RT after lumpectomy for DCIS in a population-based fashion using SEER data. Methods: We identified women with DCIS treated with lumpectomy in SEER registry data from 1987 through 1996. We evaluated the effect of RT on development of subsequent invasive breast cancer: the overall rate, the rate of ipsilateral invasive cancer, and the rate of contralateral invasive cancer. Using a proportional hazards model, we evaluated the effect of RT on development of invasive breast cancer over time adjusting for potential confounders. Results: A total of 10,034 women underwent lumpectomy for DCIS in this time period; 5063 underwent lumpectomy only and 4971 underwent RT after lumpectomy. Invasive breast cancer developed in 854 patients; 439 in the ipsilateral breast and 413 in the contralateral breast (laterality unknown in 2 cancers). The actuarial rate of invasive ipsilateral breast cancer at 8 years was 6.2% in the lumpectomy only group and 2.7% in the RT group. The actuarial rate of invasive contralateral breast cancer at 8 years was 4.2% in the lumpectomy only group and 4.0% in the RT group. Lumpectomy only was strongly associated with development of ipsilateral breast cancer over time after adjusting for potential confounders. The adjusted hazards ratio for development of ipsilateral invasive cancer was 0.43 for the RT group, as compared with the lumpectomy only group (95% CI 0.35 to 0.53), indicating that women who did not undergo RT had 2.3 times the risk of developing ipsilateral invasive breast cancer over time. RT after lumpectomy was not associated with development of contralateral invasive cancer. Conclusions: Women with DCIS in the population have a substantial risk of developing invasive breast cancer after lumpectomy. The effectiveness of RT in reducing the risk of ipsilateral cancer in the population is similar to the efficacy of RT found in trials. This supports routine use of RT after lumpectomy for DCIS in the population.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online