Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 526
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boccardo, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boccardo, F. M.

Abstract

Switching to anastrozole (ANA) vs continued tamoxifen (TAM) treatment of early breast cancer (EBC). Updated results of the Italian tamoxifen anastrozole (ITA) trial

F. M. Boccardo, A. Rubagotti, M. Puntoni, P. Guglielmini, M. Porpiglia, M. Mesiti, M. Rinaldini, G. Paladini, V. Distante, R. Franchi other ITA trialists

Univ of Genoa - Nat Cancer Rsrch Inst, Genova, Italy; S. Anna Hosp, Turin, Italy; Univ of Messina, Messina, Italy; S. Donato Hosp Arezzo, Arezzo, Italy; S. Orsola-Malpighi Hosp, Bologna, Italy; Univ of Florence, Florence, Italy; Civic Hosp, Casalpusterlengo, Italy

526

Background: We have previously shown that switching to ANA after 2–3 years of TAM is well tolerated and significantly improves event-free (EFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of postmenopausal ebc (Breast Cancer Res Treat 82, 2003). Here we report on an additional analysis at a median follow-up time of 52 mos (1–80 mos). Methods: This was an open phase III trial comparing 5 years of TAM vs 2–3 years of TAM followed by 3–2 years of ANA (total duration of treatment: 5 years). PFS was the primary end point. EFS, OS and safety were secondary end points. Results: 448 node positive, ER positive patients were enrolled. At the time of the present analysis 87 events had occurred and 26 deaths. The first site of recurrence was the ipsilateral breast or the thoracic wall or the loco-regional nodes in 16 patients. Distant metastasis were the first site of recurrence in 47 patients; 19 patients developed second primaries (including 5 controlateral breast cancers). The Hazard Ratios of patients switched to ANA for EFS, PFS, local (l) PFS and distant (d)PFS are summarized in the table (Hazards of previous analysis are reported for comparison).17 women continued on TAM died as compared to 9 of those switched to ANA (HR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.23–1.17; p=0.1). The percentages of women developing at least one AE were 40% and 46% in the two groups respectively (p=0.2). However there were 6 endometrial cancers in the TAM group compared to 1 in the ANA group. Conclusions:Safety and clinical benefits of switching to ANA following 2 or 3 years of TAM are confirmed by this updated analysis.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online