Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings.
Vol 23, No 16S (June 1 Supplement), 2005: 6
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Attiyeh, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Maris, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Attiyeh, E. F.
Right arrow Articles by Maris, J. M.

Abstract

Chromosome arm 11q deletion predicts for neuroblastoma outcome: A Children’s Oncology Group study

E. F. Attiyeh, Y. P. Mosse, Q. Wang, C. Winter, D. Khazi, G. Hii, P. W. McGrady, K. K. Matthay, W. B. London and J. M. Maris

Children’s Hosp of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Children’s Oncology Group, Gainesville, FL; Univ of CA San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

6

Background: Chromosome arm 11q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is a frequent occurrence in neuroblastoma. Previous studies have shown an association between 11q LOH and high-risk disease. However, these studies lacked the statistical power to conclusively analyze the prognostic impact of 11q LOH in multivariable analyses after adjusting for the currently used prognostic factors. Methods: We screened 917 primary neuroblastomas for chromosome 11 LOH with a panel of 4–8 microsatellite markers. Further mapping with up to 52 markers was performed on selected samples. The only inclusion criteria were availability of a constitutional DNA sample and outcome data. The sample set was representative of the overall neuroblastoma population. The median follow-up was 2.7 years. Results: LOH at chromosome arm 11q and unbalanced 11q LOH (loss of 11q material with retention or gain of 11p material) were present in 302 (33%) and 148 (16%) cases, respectively. The pattern of LOH for each tumor sample was consistent with the presence of a single region of deletion; all but two deletions involved 11q23. The majority of tumors with 11q LOH did not have MYCN amplification. Despite this, both 11q LOH and unbalanced 11q LOH were associated with high-risk disease (p<0.0001). Patients whose tumors showed unbalanced 11q LOH had 3-year EFS and OS of 50%±6% and 65%±5%, compared to 74%±2% (p<0.0001) and 83%±2% (p<0.0001) in those cases that did not (log-rank test). In a Cox proportional hazards model for multivariable analysis, unbalanced 11q LOH was independently prognostic for EFS after adjusting for stage 4, MYCN amplification, and Shimada histology (p=0.0068). Conclusion: Unbalanced 11q LOH is associated with aggressive neuroblastoma behavior and is independently prognostic for decreased EFS. Unbalanced 11q LOH status could be especially useful in determining whether a patient with locoregional neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification would benefit from more adjuvant chemotherapy.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online