Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 13048
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gagel, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gagel, R. F.

Abstract

Phase I/II trial of capecitabine (C), dacarbazine (D) and imatinib (I) (CDI) for patients (pts) metastatic medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC)

P. M. Hoff, A. O. Hoff, A. T. Phan, S. I. Sherman, J. Yao, N. White, L. Phan, J. L. Abbruzzese and R. F. Gagel

M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

13048

Background: MTC is a rare tumor that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy. 5-FU and D are frequently used, with an expected response rate of around 15%. MTC is often associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by a mutation in the RET proto-oncogene which encodes RET, a tyrosine kinase receptor. I is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against c-Kit, PDGF and possibly RET, and we postulated that its addition to chemotherapy would increase its efficacy against this disease. Methods: We designed a phase I/II trial combining escalating doses of oral C, IV D and oral I. Pts with any advanced solid tumors were eligible for the phase I part of the trial. Results: 13 pts were entered and 12 were eligible (7 MTC, 2 adrenocortical, 1 islet-cell, 1 insular thyroid and 1 small cell). 4 pts did not complete one cycle (1 pt withdrew after 5 days and 2 pts progressed in less than 10 days and were replaced for toxicity analysis, 1 had a DLT and is included). 3 patients were entered in dose level 1, without DLT. 2 out of 6 pts developed DLT at the second dose level (1 G 3 fatigue and 1 G3 hypokalemia). Three additional pts are being entered on dose level 1. The first one had PD after 7 days and is being replaced. For the 11 pts who were evaluable, best response was 3 SD (range 3 to 9 + months) and 8 PD. Conclusions: The combination of CDI is feasible but has resulted in an unexpected pattern of toxicity in this patient population, with fatigue and hypokalemia as the DLT. No significant diarrhea or hand-foot syndrome was seen. Only G1 and 2 fluid retention and neutropenia have been encountered. Only minor reduction in tumor size has been seen among these heavily pretreated pts. Once the phase I is complete, the trial will continue in a phase II setting for untreated MTC pts.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 

Author Disclosure
Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration

Novartis






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online