Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 14600
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shamseddine, A.
Right arrow Articles by El-Saghir, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shamseddine, A.
Right arrow Articles by El-Saghir, N.

Abstract

Safety and efficacy of the combination of high-dose calcitriol, docetaxel and aoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): Interim report of a phase II trial

A. Shamseddine, J. Makarem, Z. Abdel Khalik, M. Bulbul, A. Taher, R. Khawli, K. Hemadeh and N. El-Saghir

American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

14600

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Calcitriol, Docetaxel and Zoledronic acid in patients with metastatic HRPC. The primary endpoint of the study is the toxicity profile. Secondary endpoints include prostate specific antigen PSA response and time to disease progression. Methods: 16 patients with HRPC were enrolled. All patients had confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer and no previous cytotoxic therapy. All patients signed an informed consent. Patients received oral Calcitriol 0.5µg/kg on day 1 on weekly basis six out of eight-week cycles, Docetaxel 36mg/m2 on day 2 on weekly basis six out of eight-week cycles, and Zoledronic acid 4mg intravenously on weeks 1 and 5 of every 8-week cycle. Results: A total of 52 cycles were administered and toxicity was acceptable. No treatment-related mortality was encountered. No grade IV anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia or diarrhea was reported. No grade IV gastrointestinal toxicities or thromboembolic events were reported. Grade IV infection was seen in 2 (3.8%) cycles (herpetic esophagitis and listeria meningitis). Grade III neutropenia was seen in 2 cycles (3.8%). Grade III diarrhea was seen in 1 cycle (1.9%) and grade II diarrhea in 4 cycles (7.7%). Grade II to III nausea and vomiting was reported in 8 cycles (15.4%). Grade II to III sensory neuropathy was noted after 17 cycles (32.7%). Grade III fatigue was reported in 5 cycles (9.6%). 14 patients were eligible for response analysis. Overall PSA response rate of our patients was 57.2%. Median time to disease progression was 6.5 months (range 2–15). One year survival was 57.1% (8 out of 14 patients). Conclusions: This interim analysis showed that the addition of Calcitriol to Docetaxel showed an acceptable safety profile as compared to Docetaxel regimens alone with less incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea. Previous studies using Docetaxel alone has reported higher incidence of neutropenia reaching 43–56% and grade III to IV diarrhea (10–34%). Our study suggests that Calcitriol might have a protective effect against the Docetaxel toxicities.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online