|
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 4100
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology
Phase II study evaluating trimodal therapy with cetuximab intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and gemcitabine for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer [ISRCTN56652283]
R. C. Krempien,
M. W. Münter,
C. Timke,
P. E. Huber,
H. Friess,
S. Heeger,
K. K. Herfarth,
A. Abdollahi,
G. Hartung,
M. W. Buchler and
J. Debus
University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
4100
Background: The induction of EGFR targeting with cetuximab in radiation based therapy of solid tumors has yielded promising results. Thus, we initiated a prospective Phase II trial designed to analyze the feasibility and effectivity of trimodal therapy with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and cetuximab in locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer. Methods: In this phase 2 study, pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer without prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with radiotherapy (RT), gemcitabine weekly (300 mg/m2), and cetuximab weekly (loading dose 400 mg/m2 day 1, and concomitant with radiation day 8,15,22,29,36 250 mg/m2). RT was delivered by using an integrated IMRT boost concept (54 Gy GTV, 45 Gy CTV) over 5 weeks. RT was followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) weekly x 3 in 4 weeks. Response evaluation using computed tomography followed at week 12. All amenable patients were intended for surgical treatment between week 1215. Results: 24 pts were enrolled until now. Preliminary results are presented on 20 pts with the following characteristics: pancreatic adenocarcinoma c2 T4 N1 20/20, median age = 63.5 (range 5179); M/F = 13/7; ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 2/12/6; median days on treatment: 90 (range 70100). Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 16 pts. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (n = 4), fatigue (n = 2), nausea (n = 3), neutropenia (n = 6), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and vomiting (n = 2). 18/20 pts developed some acneiforme rush during therapy. No omittance of cetuximab therapy was necessary. 1 patient died during RT due to tumor bleeding. Median follow-up at present is 6 month, median survival has not been reached. Partial remissions 8/20, stable disease 9/20, progressive disease 3/20. 12/20 patients were amenable for secondary potentially curative resection. 4 patients could be resected, while 3 patients were found to have abdominal metastatic spread. Conclusions: Early data from trimodal therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with chemoradiation (IMRT), gemcitabine, and cetuximab indicate feasibility without increased toxicity profile. The local response appears to be very promising in pancreatic cancer, potentially allowing neoadjuvant treatment.
Author Disclosure
| Employment or Leadership |
Consultant or Advisory Role |
Stock Ownership |
Honoraria |
Research Funding |
Expert Testimony |
Other Remuneration |
|
| Merck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract presentation from the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting
|