Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 4510
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bajorin, D. F. Articles by Motzer, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bajorin, D. F. Articles by Motzer, R. J.

Abstract

Phase III trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy alone or with high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT) patients (PTS): A cooperative group trial by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, ECOG, SWOG, and CALGB

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Oregon Health Science Center, Portland, OR; City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nevada Cancer Institute, Las Vegas, NV; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY

4510

Background: First-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for poor-prognosis GCT PTS demonstrated improved relapse-free and overall survival compared to historical controls receiving conventional-dose regimens (JCO 1996;14:2546). Retrospective studies also showed correlations between long-term outcome and initial declines of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and/or human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). This trial sought to determine: 1) if early intervention with HDCT resulted in an outcome superior to standard-dose chemotherapy and 2) whether AFP and HCG declines during cycles 1 & 2 correlated with long-term treatment outcome. Methods: PTS with untreated intermediate- or poor-risk GCT by International criteria (IGCCCG) were randomized to either 2 cycles of standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide & cisplatin) followed by 2 cycles of HDCT (cyclophosphamide, etoposide, carboplatin) plus stem-cell rescue (BEP + HDCT) or to 4 cycles of BEP. The primary endpoint was the percent of PTS in complete response at 1 year (CR-1 yr). Based on an historical CR-1 yr of 45% for BEP, targeted accrual was 109 PTS/arm to detect a 20% improvement in PTS receiving BEP + HDCT with an alpha of 5% and 80% power. Randomization used random permuted blocks; strata were risk status (poor/intermediate) and treatment center. An independent DSMB performed one interim analysis of CR-1yr and survival in May 2000. Results: 219 PTS were randomized; 108 to BEP + HDCT and 111 to BEP alone. Final analysis demonstrated a CR-1yr of 52% for BEP + HDCT and 48% for BEP alone (P = .53 via actuarial methods). Slow marker decline PTS (AFP and/or HCG) during cycles 1 & 2 of BEP had a shorter progression-free and overall survival compared to satisfactory decline PTS (P .02) Among 70 PTS with unsatisfactory marker decline in cycles 1 & 2, the CR-1 yr was 61% for PTS receiving HDCT for cycles 3 & 4 versus 31% for those receiving 2 more cycles of BEP (P = .008). Conclusions: The routine inclusion of HDCT for intermediate- and poor-risk GCT does not improve treatment outcome. Serum marker decline during the first 2 cycles of BEP chemotherapy provides a clinically useful estimate of outcome. Research support provided by the NIH.

Author Disclosure

Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Bristol-Myers Squibb Bristol-Myers Squibb Bristol-Myers Squibb

Abstract presentation from the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting