Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 4519
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mead, G. M. Articles by Kirk, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Mead, G. M. Articles by Kirk, S.

Abstract

Medical Research Council trial of 2 versus 5 CT scans in the surveillance of patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom; Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom; Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom; Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom

4519

Background: Surveillance is a standard management approach for stage 1 non seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT), yet there is no agreement on the number of CT scans that are required to detect relapses. A randomised trial of 2 versus 5 CT scans was performed to determine whether the number of scans influenced the prognostic group (J Clin Oncol 15:594–603, 1997) at relapse. Methods: Patients with clinical stage 1 NSGCT opting for surveillance were randomised to chest and abdominal CT scans at either 3 and 12 or 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months, with all other investigations (clinical exams, markers, chest X-rays) carried out at equal frequency in the two arms. 3/5 patients were allocated to the 2 scan schedule. 400 patients were required to exclude a 3% increase in the proportion of patients relapsing with IGCCCG intermediate or poor prognosis disease with 90% power at the 5% significance level (1-sided). Results: 247 patients were allocated to 2 CT scans and 167 to 5 CT scans. With a median follow up of 40 months 37 (15%) relapses have occurred in the 2 scan arm and 33 (20%) in the 5 scan arm. No patients were poor prognosis at relapse but 2 (0.8%) of those relapsing in the 2 scan arm were intermediate prognosis compared to 1 (0.6%) in the 5 scan arm a difference of 0.2% (90% CI –1.2%, +1.6%). The mean diameter of abdominal mass at relapse was 2.1 cm in the two scan arm and 2.2 cm in the five scan arm. After chemotherapy a residual mass was present in 35% in the 2 scan and 36% in the 5 scan arm. No deaths have been reported. Conclusions: This study can exclude with 95% probability an increase in the proportion of patients relapsing with intermediate or poor prognosis disease of more than 1.6% if they have 2 rather than 5 CT scans as part of their surveillance protocol. CT scans at 3 and 12 months after orchidectomy should be considered as the new standard and will be associated with a reduction in radiation exposure.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting