Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 4638
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abetz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saad, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Abetz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saad, F.

Abstract

Impact of zoledronic acid (Z) on pain in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases in a randomised placebo-control trial

L. Abetz, V. Barghout, R. Arbuckle, V. Bosch, N. Shirina and F. Saad

Mapi Values Ltd, Bollington, United Kingdom; Novartis, East Hanover, NJ; Mapi Values Ltd, Lyon, France; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, PQ, Canada

4638

Background: Bone metastases occur in up to 80% of advanced prostate cancer patients and can results in painful Skeletal-Related Events (SREs). Z is the only biphosphonate approved for metastatic prostate cancer that decreases the occurrence of SREs which include pathologic fractures, severe bone pain requiring radiation therapy, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and hypercalcemia of malignancy which may lead to daily activity limitations. We performed retrospective analyses on data from a placebo-controlled study of Z to investigate which items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were most sensitive to changes in patient’s pain due to treatment. Methods: Prostate cancer patients with bone metastases received Zoledronate 4 mg (n = 201) or placebo (n = 201). The BPI was administered at baseline (visit 2), and visits 3 (weeks 3–4), 4 (weeks 6–8), and then every second visit (every 6 weeks) until study end. Changes in BPI individual item scores and the Pain Severity and Pain Interference scale scores were compared between Z and placebo groups. Post-baseline missing data was replaced by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Results: Z was statistically significantly better than placebo for changes in BPI items ‘pain at its worst’, ‘pain at its least’, ‘pain on average’, and the BPI pain severity scale (p < 0.05) at visit 4 (weeks 6–8), and visit 6 (week 12). For ‘pain right now’ there were statistically significant differences at visit 4, but not visit 6. Z was also superior to placebo for ‘pain right now’ and the Pain Severity and Interference scales at visit 12 (week 30–32) (p < 0.05). Finally Z was superior to placebo for ‘interference with general activities’ at visits 12 (week 30–32), 16 (weeks 42–44), and LOCF (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Z significantly reduces bone pain and general activity limitations in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Several items in the BPI are more sensitive to Z treatment including ‘pain at its worst’, ‘pain at its least’, ‘pain on average’, and the BPI Pain Severity scale.


Author Disclosure
Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration

Novartis Novartis Novartis

Abstract presentation from the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online