Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 6598
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khan, K. D. Articles by Uprichard, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Khan, K. D. Articles by Uprichard, M. J.

Abstract

Phase II study of talabostat and rituximab in fludarabine/rituximab-resistant or refractory patients with CLL

Indiana Oncology Hematology Consultants, Indianapolis, IN; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, NY; Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC; Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk, VA; Kendle International Inc, Cincinnati, OH; Point Therapeutics, Boston, MA

6598

Background: Talabostat (TAL) is an orally administered small molecule inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidases such as CD26 and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in bone marrow, lymph nodes, and stroma of solid tumors, and TAL induces cytokine and chemokines in lymph nodes and spleen. TAL enhances the activity of rituximab (RTX) in a mouse model of lymphoma. This study evaluates the efficacy of TAL + RTX in patients with advanced CLL who failed fludarabine (FLU) and/or RTX. Methods: Single-arm, open-label study of RTX 375mg/m² weekly x 4 weeks, and TAL-300mcg BID for 6 days following each RTX infusion for a tx course of 28 days. Additional courses permitted depending on tolerability. Eligibility criteria include ECOG PS 0–2, CD20+ B-CLL, Rai Stage III/IV or Rai I/II with marked lymphadenopathy, no CNS metastases, and primary resistance or PD following FLU and/or RTX. Primary endpoint is response rate per NCI-WG criteria. Secondary endpoints include response duration, PFS, and survival. Results: 40 patients (32 men, 8 women), median age 64.0 (range 42–83) have entered the study. Most (85%) are caucasian, and 78% of patients are Rai Stage IV. Mean serum B2 microglobulin is 6.5mg/L. The median number of prior regimens is 4 (range 1 to 10); 78% of patients received prior RTX and 33% prior alemtuzumab. Partial response (PR) has been reported in 8/36 evaluable patients (22%), 6 of whom had failed RTX; 3 of these patients had also failed alemtuzumab. Response duration currently ranges from 2 to 10 months (median 5.0 months). Most toxicities are Grade 1 or 2, and include nausea, fever (28% each), and edema (25%). Fever with associated Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia is reported in 2 and 1 patient, respectively. Other Grade 3 AEs include dyspnea (n=3), fatigue (n=2), and aspergillus pneumonia and a dermal fungal infection in 1 patient each. Grade 4 AEs are thrombocytopenia, hypoglycemia, and pulmonary embolism in 1 patient each. 4 patients died due to CLL (2 due to PD) or related complications (PE or MRSA pneumonia, 1 each). Conclusions: TAL + RTX shows promising activity in CLL patients with advanced disease who failed FLU and/or RTX. AEs are similar to those seen with RTX, with the exception of edema in 25% of patients. Updated results, including median PFS and survival will be presented at the annual meeting.

Author Disclosure

Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Kendle International, Point Therapeutics Point Therapeutics Point Therapeutics Point Therapeutics

Abstract presentation from the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting