Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 24, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 8555
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Secin, F. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Secin, F. P.

Abstract

International multi-centre study of incidence and risk factors of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and or pulmonary embolism (PE) in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP)

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest Cédex, France; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil, France; Hôpital Erasme, Clinique Universitare, Bruxelles, Belgium; Lahey Clinic, Burlington, MA; Clinique St. Augustin, Bordeaux, France; Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen, Innsbruek, Austria

8555

Background: There is no data regarding the incidence and variables associated with symptomatic DVT and or PE in patients undergoing LRP. Our aim was to evaluate the multi-centric incidence and risk factors for perioperative symptomatic DVT and PE after LRP. Methods: Patients with symptomatic DVT and or PE occurring within 2 months of surgery since start of the respective institutional LRP experience were included. Eight academic centers from both the United States and Europe participated. Diagnoses were made by Doppler ultrasound for DVT; and lung ventilation/perfusion scan and or chest computed tomography for PE. Associations between variables and DVT and/or PE were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test for categorical predictors and logistic regression for continuous predictors. Results: Patient reoperation (p value) (<0.001), tobacco exposure (0.02), prior DVT (0.007), larger prostate size (0.02) and length of hospital stay (0.009) were significantly associated with higher risk of symptomatic DVT/PE. The nonuse of perioperative heparin was not a risk factor (1), as well as neoadjuvant therapy (1), perioperative transfusion (0.1), body mass index (0.9), surgical technique (0.3), operating time (0.2) and pathologic stage (0.5). There were no related deaths. Patients receiving preoperative heparin had significantly higher mean operative blood loss, 480cc vs 332cc (<0.001) However, this did not translate into longer hospital stay (0.07); higher transfusion rates (0.09) or reoperation rates (0.3). The estimated cost of heparin prophylaxis in these patients exceeded $2.5 million. Conclusion: The incidence of symptomatic DVT or PE was similar despite different prophylactic regimens. Our data does not support the administration of prophylactic heparin in LRP to low risk patients (no prior DVT, no tobacco exposure, no prostate enlargement and or no anticipation of prolonged hospital stay).

Abstract presentation from the 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting