Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 12529
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elshenshawy, H. Articles by Bader, H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Elshenshawy, H. Articles by Bader, H.

Abstract

Hypofractionated therapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Mansoura Faculty of Medicine-Mansoura university, Mansoura, Egypt

12529

Background: To evaluate efficacy of short- course radiotherapy(RT) in elderly (>60years) patients with glioblastoma multiforme(GBM), and compare this biological similar short -course radiotherapy with a standard radiotherapy Methods: Forty-four elderly patients with GBM were randomly assigned after surgery to receive either a short-course of radiotherapy (45 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks ) or standard radiotherapy (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6weeks) to a target volume described as tumor visible on CT scan and a 2- cm margin . The primary end point was overall survival. Results: The overall response rate and median duration of response were 60%and 8.5 months in short- course RT versus 65% and 8 months in standard RT . Improvement in pretreatment performance status and increase in post- treatment corticosteroid dosage were observed in 50% and 25% in short- course RT versus 40% and 50% in standard RT (P=0.09, P=0.031) respectively. Median survival time was 5.9 months in short-course RT versus 5.6 months in standard RT . Six months, 1-year survival and progression-free survival rates were 40%, 15% and 30% ,10% in short- course RT versus 45%, 10% and 35% , 5% in standard RT , respectively. In both treatment groups, females did significantly better than males, patients with KPS 60–70 did significantly better than those with KPS 50 , patients having tumors 4–5 cm did significantly better than those with tumors 6–8 cm as well as did those with more radical surgery when compared to those with biopsy only. On multivariate analysis , only tumor size and extent of surgery were found to independently influence survival. Acute toxicity was generally assessed as mild in the two treatment groups. While RT -induced brain necrosis appeared only in one patient received short- course RT, but this patient died from tumor recurrence. Conclusions: Hypofractionated RT is feasible and safe treatment for elderly patients with GBM.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.