Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 17039
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rowe, K. Articles by Abernethy, A. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rowe, K. Articles by Abernethy, A. P.

Abstract

Choice of adjuvant and first-line metastatic chemotherapy (CT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) treated in the Carolinas

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

17039

Background: CT choice is influenced by many factors including published evidence, guidelines, cost, reimbursement, patient considerations, key opinion leaders, and anecdote. Substantial locoregional variation in practice patterns can exist, and therefore studies of locoregional practice provide important information on local drivers of care. Methods: Using a population-based strategy, we identified CRC patients who developed metastatic disease since 6/1/03 from 9 Duke Oncology Network community practices and 1 academic practice in North and South Carolina. Demographic, comorbidity, diagnostic, stage, initial treatment, and metastatic treatment data were abstracted by retrospective chart review, double-entered and verified for accuracy. Results: Of the first 743 charts screened, 306 were eligible (mean age 61 (SD 13), 49% male; 65% white; 22% black; 77% colon cancer and 19% rectal; stages II 8%, III 16%, IV 64%). 26 earlier stage rectal cancer patients received neoadjuvant treatment, 50% infusional fluorouracil (5FU) and 42% capecitabine (Cap). 46 colon cancer patients received adjuvant CT, including 5FU/leucovorin (LVN; 54%), 5FU/LVN/oxaliplatin (21%), Cap (9%), and 5FU/LVN/irinotecan (7%). First-line CT for metastatic colon cancer (n=149) included FOLFOX+-bevacizumab (Bev; 42%), Cap/oxaliplatin +- Bev (23%), 5FU/LVN + Bev (9%), FOLFIRI +- Bev (7%), IFL +- Bev (7%), clinical trial (7%), Cap (3%), and unknown (1%). 54% of patients received Bev overall, reflecting 49% usage before 6/05 and 69% after 6/05. CT was not offered for 25 (8%) at initial diagnosis. Conclusion: Locoregional practice patterns in the Carolinas suggest that for adjuvant treatment of CRC, oxaliplatin has been used in 21% of adjuvant and 75% of first-line metastatic colon CT regimens, and that bevacizumab use has increased to 69% of first-line metastatic CRC patients.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.