Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 21120
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perazzo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Elsner, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Perazzo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Elsner, B.

Abstract

Breast cancer submicrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph node by molecular biology techniques: A new tumor staging method?

F. Perazzo, V. Denninghoff V, A. Avagnina, F. Paesani, D. Allende, A. García, G. Crimi, E. Abalo and B. Elsner

CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina

21120

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze by molecular biology techniques (MBT) the presence of RNAm of mammaglobin (MAG) A and B in breast sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) by RT-PCR, and to correlate these findings with breast tumor characteristics. Methods: SLN from 51 patients with breast tumors smaller than or equal to 3 cm, with no palpable axillary lymphadenopathies were included. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE), immunohistochemistry study (IHC) and MBT were performed. Patients’ staging was assessed according to Saint Gallen's Consensus. Twenty-five patients had clinical follow-up. Results: HE showed metastasis in 4/51 cases, 5/51 were detected with IHC, and one of them negative for HE. MBT allowed the detection of 18/51 positive SN, which included the 5 above-mentioned cases. The other lymph nodes herein studied (33/51) showed no metastases with MBT. Patients’ mean age was 58 years, tumor's mean size was 0.96 cm. The average follow-up was 15 months (range: 1–29 months). The patient with a recurrence at 23 months of clinical follow-up was found to be the only one with HE (+), IHC (+), MAG-A (+) and MAG-B (+). Conclusions: SN study with HE fails to identify all SN with metastases. Immunohistochemistry and MBT increase metastasis detection. Multiplex RT-PCR technique for A and B MAG proves to be specific and sensitive. No direct relationship was found between the risk factors analyzed and the expression of MAG. Therefore, MAG could be used independently as a prognostic factor. The presence of hidden metastasis plays a significant role mainly in the overall survival rate of pre- and postmenopausal patients. This study will be useful to formulate hypotheses. Further research, including a larger population and a longer follow-up period, will be required to confirm these hypotheses. Should our findings be confirmed in the future, molecular biology determinations could modify patients staging and treatment.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online