Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 4512
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thirion, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thirion, P. G.

Abstract

Individual patient data-based meta-analysis assessing pre-operative chemotherapy in resectable oesophageal carcinoma

P. G. Thirion, S. Michiels, A. Le Maître, J. Tierney on behalf of the MetaAnalysis of Chemotherapy in Esophagus Cancer Collaborative Group

Saint Luke’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France; MRC, London, United Kingdom

4512

Background: Optimal management of operable localised oesophageal carcinoma remains to be determined. The debate is fuelled by some positive individual trials showing a benefit of preoperative chemotherapy (CT+S) or preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT+S) over surgery alone (S). Our group has initiated an individual patient data-based meta-analysis to quantify the potential benefit of CT+S over S. Methods: The methodology used for trial identification and data analysis has been previously reported. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were disease-free-survival (DFS) analyzed with a 6 months landmark method, tumour resectability (complete resection rate) and post-operative mortality. The logrank-test, stratified by trial, and hazard ratio (HR) were used for comparison. Subgroup analyses by age, sex, performance status, and histologic type were prospectively planned. Results: Twelve eligible randomized trials (2,284 patients) were identified. Individual patient data from 9 trials (2,102 patients) with a median follow-up of 5.3 years were available for the OS analysis. There was a statistically significant OS benefit in favour of CT+S (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.95, p=0.003) translating into a 5-year absolute OS increase of 4% (from 16 to 20%). Based on 7 trials (1,849 patients), the HR for DFS was 0.82 (95% CI 0.74–0.91, p=0.001) in favour of CT+S, representing a 5-year absolute DFS benefit of 4% (from 6 to 10%). The complete resection rate across 8 trials (1,933 patients) was significantly greater in the CT+S arm (67%) compared to the S arm (62%) (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.98, p=0.03). No difference was seen in postoperative death (6.7%). No interaction between treatment effect and patients characteristics was seen. Conclusions: Individual patient data-based meta-analysis represents the highest level of evidence and this study shows a small but significant overall and disease-free survival benefit in favour of preoperative chemotherapy over surgery alone. Unrestricted grants from LNCC and Sanofi-Aventis.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online