Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 4531
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crehange, G. Articles by Bedenne, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Crehange, G. Articles by Bedenne, L.

Abstract

Impact of radiation (RT) regimen on palliative procedures (PP) for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with exclusive chemoradiation (CRT) or preoperative chemoradiation (CRT+S): results from a phase III trial of the Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD 9102)

Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; University Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France; University Hospital Le Bocage, Dijon, France

4531

Background: The FFCD 9102 trial demonstrated that CRT is an alternative to CRT+S for responding patients. We investigated the type of PP in the follow-up (FU) period, according to the RT scheme: protracted (P-RT) vs. split course (SC-RT). Methods: Resectable T3 N0–1 M0 thoracic esophageal carcinoma were included. First sequence : 2 cycles of cisplatin and 5-FU (day (d)1 - d22) combined with RT. Two schemes of RT were allowed: P-RT (46 Gy / 4.5 weeks (w), 2 Gy / f) or SC-RT (2 one-week courses of 15 Gy, 3 Gy / f). For CRT, the same chemotherapy was given on d43, d64 and d92 combined with 20 Gy / 2w (P-RT) or 15 Gy / 1w (SC-RT). Responding patients after the first sequence were randomized between CRT and CRT+S. The impact of SC-RT vs. P-RT on PP in the FU period was explored using a Mann-Whitney test. Results: From February 1993 to December 2000, 451 pts were registered and 446 were eligible. P-RT: 161 pts, SC-RT: 285 pts. After a median FU of 47.4 months, 2-year overall survival and local relapse-free survival were for P-RT vs. SC-RT: 37.1% vs. 30.5% (p = 0.25) and 76.7% vs. 56.8% (p = 0.002), respectively. P-RT vs. SC-RT: mean length of hospital stay: 48 d vs. 60.5 d (p= 0.0003). Mean number of dilatation sessions: 0.56 vs. 0.66 (p= 0.43). Mean number of stents: 0.21 vs. 0.34 (p= 0.03). Mean number of any PP: 1.01 vs. 1.50 (p= 0.001). Mean dysphagia grade: 2.99 vs. 3.12 (p= 0.21). In the CRT+S-group, P-RT vs. SC-RT: mean length of hospital stay 55.0d vs. 68.7d (p =0.051). Mean number of dilatation sessions: 0.74 vs. 0.74 (p= 0.77). Mean number of stents: 0.09 vs. 0.18 (p= 0.44). Mean number of PP: 1.00 vs. 1.37 (p= 0.054). In the CRT-group, P-RT vs. SC-RT, mean length of hospital stay: 42.6d vs 54.0d (p= 0.053). Mean number of dilatation sessions : 0.38 vs. 0.67 (p= 0.12). Mean number of stents: 0.31 vs. 0.50 (p= 0.03). Mean number of PP: 0.83 vs. 1.86 (p= 0.0005). Conclusions: Stents, rate of PP and length of hospital stay were significantly increased with SC-RT. Dysphagia score was similar between SC-RT and P-RT at last FU.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting