Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 4573
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krempien, R.
Right arrow Articles by Debus, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krempien, R.
Right arrow Articles by Debus, J.

Abstract

Cetuximab in combination with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and gemcitabine for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A prospective phase II trial [PARC-Study ISRCTN56652283]

R. Krempien, M. W. Munter, C. Timke, H. Friess, G. Hartung, K. K. Herfarth, A. Abdollahi, M. W. Buchler, P. E. Huber and J. Debus

University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

4573

Background: The induction of EGFR targeting with cetuximab in radiation based therapy of solid tumors has yielded promising results. Thus, we initiated a prospective phase II trial designed to analyze the feasibility and effectivity of trimodal therapy with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and cetuximab in locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer. Methods: In this phase 2 study, pts with locally advanced pancreatic cancer without prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with radiotherapy (RT), gemcitabine weekly (300mg/m2), and cetuximab weekly (loading dose 400mg/m2 day 1, and concomitant with radiation day 8,15,22,29,36 250mg/m2). RT was delivered by using an integrated IMRT boost concept (54 Gy GTV, 45 Gy CTV) over 5 weeks. RT was followed by gemcitabine (1,000mg/m2) weekly x 3 in 4 weeks. Response evaluation using CT followed at week 12. All pts were intended for surgical treatment between week 12–15. Pts were followed for adverse events and response. Results: 55 pts were enrolled. Preliminary results are presented on 36 pts with the following characteristics: pancreatic adenocarcinoma c2 T4 N1 36/36, median age = 61.5 (range 48–79); M/F = 24/12; ECOG PS 0/1/2 = 6/26/4; median days on treatment: 90 (range 70–100). Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 22 pts. Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (n=5), fatigue (n=4), nausea (n=6), neutropenia (n=10), thrombocytopenia (n=4), and vomiting (n=4). 34/36 pts developed some acneiforme rush during therapy. No omittance of cetuximab was necessary in any of the pts. 1 patient died during treatment due to tumor bleeding. Median follow-up at present is 13 month, 1-year survival was 57%, median survival has not been reached. Partial remissions 12/36, stable disease 20/36, progressive disease 4/36 (RECIST). 21/36 pts were amenable for secondary potentially curative resection. 9 pts could be resected, while 8 pts were found to have abdominal metastatic spread. Conclusions: Early data from trimodal therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with chemoradiation (IMRT), gemcitabine, and cetuximab indicate feasibility without increased toxicity profile. The local response appears to be very promising in pancreatic cancer.


Author Disclosure
Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration

Merck KGaA

Abstract presentation from the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online