Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 519
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ibrahim, M. N. Articles by Martin, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ibrahim, M. N. Articles by Martin, M. J.

Abstract

Comparison of survival rates in carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with total mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy

Sligo General Hospital, Sligo, Ireland

519

Background: Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the breast is a precancerous lesion with the potential to progress to invasive cancer. In 2003, CIS accounted for 19% of all newly diagnosed invasive and non-invasive breast lesions combined in the United States. Current treatment options are mastectomy ± tamoxifen, and breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy ± tamoxifen. As there are no randomized comparisons of these 2 treatments, data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to compare their survival rates. Methods: 88,285 patients were identified with CIS from 1988 - 2003. Of these, 27,728 patients were treated with a total mastectomy, and 25,240 patients received breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare overall survival and disease specific survival at 5 and 10 years. Results: Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated 5 year overall survival rates for total mastectomy vs. breast conserving surgery with radiotherapy of 95.46% vs. 97.59% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). The 5 year rates for disease specific survival were 99.16% vs. 99.72% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). At 10 years the overall survival rates had fallen to 91.96% vs. 96.09% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). The 10 year disease specific survival rates were 98.61% vs. 99.50% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). Cox proportional hazards regression demonstrated a relative risk of 0.847 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.790 - 0.907) and 1.110 (95% CI 0.931 - 1.324) for 5 year overall survival and disease specific survival respectively, when total mastectomy was compared with breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. At 10 years, the relative risks were 0.865 (95% CI 0.820 - 0.913) and 1.035 (95% CI 0.900 - 1.190) for overall survival and disease specific survival respectively. Conclusions: Overall, when looking at disease-specific survival rates by multi-variate analysis, there does not appear to be a significant difference between total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy in the treatment of CIS.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting