Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: LBA1
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Llovet, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Llovet, J.

Abstract

Randomized phase III trial of sorafenib versus placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; St. Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy; National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy; University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany; Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France; J.W. Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany; Bayer HealthCare, Toronto, ON, Canada; Bayer S.p.A PH, Milan, Italy; Bayer HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany; Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

LBA1

Background: HCC is the 3rd cause of cancer death globally with most deaths occurring within 1 year of diagnosis. No standard therapy exists for advanced HCC. Sorafenib (Sor) is a multikinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic, pro-apoptotic and Raf kinase inhibitory activity, with clinical activity in a phase II HCC trial. This large, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of Sor vs placebo (P) in pts with HCC. Methods: Patients with advanced measurable HCC, no prior systemic treatment, ECOG PS 0–2 and Child-Pugh status A received Sor 400 mg bid or P. Primary efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to symptomatic progression (TTSP). Time to progression (TTP) and disease control rate (DCR; CR+PR+SD for at least 2 cycles) were secondary endpoints.Treatment arms were compared for OS and TTSP using a 1-sided log-rank test [overall a of 0.02 (OS) and 0.005 (TTSP)] stratified by region, ECOG PS and tumor burden. An O’Brien-Fleming-type error spending function determined criteria for early stopping for efficacy. Results: 602 pts (Sor n=299; P n=303) were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar for Sor vs P: median age (67 vs 68 y), male (87% vs 87%), ECOG PS 0 (54% vs 54%), Child-Pugh A (95% vs 98%), and BCLC stage C (82% vs 83%). Based on 321 deaths (Sor n=143; P n=178), the hazard ratio (HR) for OS (Sor/P) was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.87; p=0.0006), representing a 44% improvement in OS vs P which met early stopping criteria. Median OS was 10.7 vs 7.9 mos (Sor vs P). Primary TTSP analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference for Sor vs P. HR for TTP (independent assessment) was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.74; p=0.000007). Median TTP was longer (5.5 vs 2.8 mos) and DCR was higher (43% vs 32%) with Sor vs P. Incidence of serious adverse events was similar for Sor vs P (52% vs 54%). The most frequent grade 3/4 events were diarrhea (11% vs 2%), hand-foot skin reaction (8% vs 1%), fatigue (10% vs 15%), and bleeding (6% vs 9%) for Sor vs P. Conclusions: Sorafenib was well tolerated and is the first agent to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in OS for pts with advanced HCC. This effect is clinically meaningful and establishes sorafenib as first-line treatment for these pts.

Author Disclosure

Employment Consultant Stock Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Bayer

Abstract presentation from the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting