Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 25, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: LBA4509
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Philip, P. A. Articles by Blanke, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Philip, P. A. Articles by Blanke, C.

Abstract

Phase III study of gemcitabine [G] plus cetuximab [C] versus gemcitabine in patients [pts] with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [PC]: SWOG S0205 study

Karmanos Cancer Inst, Detroit, MI; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; USC Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Southeastern Med/Onc Center, Goldsboro, NC; OHSU Hem/Med Onc, Portland, OR

LBA4509

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] pathway is a rational target for therapeutic intervention. This study tested the efficacy of an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody and gemcitabine [G] combination in the Phase III setting in patients with advanced PC. Methods: Eligibility included locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PC; adequacy of organ function; performance status (PS) 0- 2; no prior EGFR therapy; no prior systemic chemotherapy except for adjuvant chemotherapy; and submission of tumor for EGFR immunostaining. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included objective response, time to progression, pain control, and quality of life. Assuming 6 months median survival, the study was designed to detect a median improvement to 8 months (1.33 hazard ratio) with 90% power, based on a one-sided 0.0125 test, and 704 eligible patients. Primary analyses used a Cox regression model, stratified for factors used in the randomization. Patients were stratified by PS, stageand prior pancreatectomy, and randomized to either G alone or G plus C. G was given at a dose of 1,000 mg/m²/wk for seven weeks out of 8, then 3 weeks on and one week off. C was given as a loading dose of 400 mg/m² on week 1 and then 250 mg/m² weekly. Results: 766 pts (735 eligible) with a median age of 64 (30–91) were enrolled by SWOG and CTSU between January 2004 and April 2006. Of those, 51% were males, 21.5% had locally advanced disease, and 13% had PS of 2. The study closed with full accrual. The median survival was 6 months in the G arm and 6.5 months in the G plus C arm for an overall HR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.93–1.27, p= 0.14) . The corresponding PFS was 3 months and 3.5 months, for G and G+C arms, respectively (HR =1.13, 95%CI .97–1.3, p=.058). The confirmed response probabilities were 7 % in each arm, and inclusion of unconfirmed responses yielded 14% in the G arm and 12% in the G + C arm.702 pts were evaluable for toxicity. 90 pts experienced at least one grade 4 toxicity; 14% on the G plus C, 11% on G alone. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate a clinically significant advantage of the addition of cetuximab to gemcitabine for overall survival, PFS and response in advanced PC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting