Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 26, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2008: 15525
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, L.
Right arrow Articles by Overman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ho, L.
Right arrow Articles by Overman, M. J.

Abstract

Retrospective review of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU (DCF) given on a weekly basis for the treatment of advanced gastric or esophageal cancer

L. Ho, A. T. Phan, J. Jhamb, M. Mani, E. Tetzlaff, E. Lin, J. A. Ajani, J. L. Abbruzzese and M. J. Overman

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

15525

Background: DCF administered every three weeks results in a high rate of treatment-related adverse events. At M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) a weekly formulation of DCF has been utilized in patients who were not considered candidates for every three week dosing. Methods: A single institution retrospective review of patients with metastatic or locally advanced gastric or esophageal cancer treated with weekly DCF from 1/2002 to 3/2007 was conducted. Over this time period a standard order-set was in place in which cisplatin 20 mg/m2, 5FU 350 mg/m2 and docetaxel 20 mg/m2 was given once weekly for 6 consecutive weeks every 8 weeks (one cycle). Only patients who were treated at MDACC, received ≥3 weeks of treatment and had follow-up evaluation were included. Tumor response was calculated retrospectively using RECIST criteria. Results: Fifty-seven patients were identified: tumor type: gastric (20), esophageal (18) or gastroesophageal cancer (19); histology: adenocarcinoma (44) or squamous cell carcinoma (13); disease status: metastatic (42) or locally advanced (15). The median age was 60 years (33 to 81), 67% were male, and 94% were chemo-naive. The average number of cycles administered was 1.8 (1 to 4). Hematological toxicity was minimal with grade 3/4 granulocytopenia in 1 patient, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 0 patients, and grade 3/4 anemia in 5 patients. No patient had a neutropenic infection but grade 3/4 non-neutropenic infections occurred in 4 patients. Fatigue was reported by 29 patients, nausea/vomiting by 26 patients, and diarrhea by 17. A total of 16 patients had dose delays or dose reductions related to toxicity. Forty-nine patients had measurable disease with a partial response occurring in 27% (95% CI 15% to 41%) and stable disease occurring in 45%. Forty-nine patients have died with median follow-up of 8.8 months. Progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI 3 to 6.2 m) and overall survival was 8.9 months (95% CI 7 to 10.8 m). Conclusions: Weekly DCF according to this schedule has minimal hematological toxicity and overall excellent tolerance in this population of patients who were not considered candidates for DCF administered every three weeks.


Author Disclosure
Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Expert Testimony Other Remuneration

Ascenta, sanofi-aventis, Taiho






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online