Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 26, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2008: 22144
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Port, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abend, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Port, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abend, M.

Abstract

A gene signature completely identifies metastasized testis tumors

M. Port, Y. Wang, H. U. Schmelz, T. Pottek, C. Ruf and M. Abend

Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; German Research Center for Environment and Health, Munich, Germany; Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany; Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany

22144

Background: Selection of gene targets to distinguish metastasized from non-metastasized seminoma. Methods: Total RNA was isolated from metastasized seminoma (n=10, T1–3N0M0 to T1N1–2M0), non-metastasized seminoma (n=21) and corresponding normal tissues. The RNA from 10 biopsies of each tissue type was pooled and separately hybridized on four whole genome microarrays (Human Genome Survey Microarray V2.0, Applied Biosystem) for screening purposes. 92 selected gene candidates were then quantitatively examined using RTQ-PCR. Results: Agreement in gene expression was 88% between the whole genome microarrays and RTQ-PCR. Metastasized seminoma showed 1,912 upregulated and 2,179 downregulated genes with ≥ 2-fold differences in gene expression as compared to non-metastasized seminoma. The number of upregulated genes coding for immunity and defense, cell signaling and developmental processes were significantly overrepresented. RTQ-PCR showed that mean gene expression values of the 92 genes in general were significantly reduced in metastasized compared to non-metastasized seminoma. The presence of metastases could be completely predicted (100% specificity) based on a 85-gene expression signature by using Logistic Regression. Accompanied sensitivity and accuracy of the 10-fold crossvalidation model were 77.8% and 84.2%, respectively. Conclusions: A logistic regression model using the 85 gene expression signature allowed complete identification of metastasized seminoma.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.






About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online