Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 27, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2009: 10048
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Publisher's Note Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khattab, T. M. Articles by Ahmed, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Khattab, T. M. Articles by Ahmed, B.

Abstract

How could improvement in the management of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia be achieved? Experience of Princess Nourah Oncology Center, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Leukemia Research Group; King Khalid National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Leukemia Research Group; King Khalid National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Sao Tome and Principe

10048

Background: T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is representing 10–15% of pediatric ALL. The use of more intensive treatments and risk adapted therapy have significantly improved the outcome of patients with T-ALL and event-free survival rate of 60–70% are now reported in children. Our published data showed that T-ALL phenotype patients fared poorly with 5 year survival of 27% versus 83% for precursor B-ALL (Recent Advances Research Update: 2006, 7; 1, P 51–56). Objectives: We reviewed all patients diagnosed with T-ALL to assess risk classification according to NCI criteria, type of therapy received, overall survival and causes of mortality. Methods: Retrospective review of all patients files diagnosed with T-ALL from 1989 until now with data collection including; sex, age, white cell count (WBCs), CNS disease, type of protocol used, length of survival, overall survival, cause of death (toxic, disease). Results: Over the last 20 years, T-ALL cases registered were 52/460 (11%) of all ALL cases, Male:Female ratio 42:10 (4.2:1), median age 7 year (range: 1.5–12 yrs). Median WBCs 50,000/Cmm (range: 1.500–619,000/Cmm) and positive CNS at diagnosis 10/52 (20%). NCI risk classification criteria showed SR 24/52 (46%) and HR 28/52 (54%). Protocols used were UKALL ( n = 21; 3 UKALL X-B, 4 UKALL X-D, 10 UKALL XI and 4 MRC-97 ). BFM (n = 8); and CCG 1961 (n = 23). Overall survival 27/52 (52%) and 25 pts. died (48%); 15 secondary to disease recurrence (9 on UKALL, 4 BFM, 2 CCG 1961); 4 during induction, 1 fulminant hepatic failure, 1 tumor lysis syndrome, and 4 due to toxicities (mucormycosis, staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, CMV pneumonia, pseudomonas sepsis). Survival for different regimen; UKALL: 5/21=31%, BFM: 4/8=50%, CCG: 18/23=78%, while overall cohort survival 52%. Mean length of survivors 4 year (range 4–140 month) and mean length for non-survivors 1 year (range 0.1–40 months). Conclusions: This review showed the improvement of T-ALL survival from 27% to 56%. Using augmented therapy based on CCG1961 was associated with better outcome. Further risk and response stratification in addition to intensification of therapy for T-cell ALL in our center may prove to be beneficial. Therapy remains an important prognostic factor.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting