Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 27, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2009: 5504
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karam, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karlan, B. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Karam, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karlan, B. Y.

Abstract

Influence of residual disease and extreme drug resistance assays on outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

A. Karam, J. Wang Chiang, E. Fung, V. Nossov and B. Y. Karlan

The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

5504

Background: Extreme drug resistance (EDR) assays have been used as tools in identifying those agents that are least likely to be of clinical benefit in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We sought to examine the effect of obtaining EDR assays on the outcome of patients with EOC in the primary and recurrent setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of demographic, pathologic, EDR assay and outcome data from 377 patients with EOC who had an assay sent at the time of their diagnosis or at recurrence. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards method were performed to identify and estimate the impact of independent prognostic factors on time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and survival after recurrence (RS). Results: Increasing age was associated with a worse OS and RS (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14–1.58 and HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00–1.31, for each decade increase in age respectively). Compared with patients with microscopic residual disease, patients who were left with 0.1 to 1.0 cm and >1.0 cm residual disease had an increased risk of recurrence (HR=1.94; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.84 and HR=3.61; 95% CI; 2.07 to 6.39, respectively) and death (HR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.45; and HR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.20, respectively). For patients who recurred, those who did not undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery and patients who were left with >1.0 cm residual had an increased risk of death compared to patients with microscopic residual (HR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.54; and HR = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.71 to 4.71, respectively). EDR assay results for single agents or combinations did not independently predict patient outcomes. Conclusions: The amount of residual disease continues to be an important prognostic factor, especially when all macroscopic disease is removed both in the primary and recurrent setting. Increasing age is also an independent predictor of OS and RS. EDR assay results do not independently predict or alter the outcomes of patients with EOC who are treated with the current standard of care including optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum and taxane combination chemotherapy in either the primary or recurrent setting.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online