Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 27, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2009: 5518
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Malley, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gehrig, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Malley, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gehrig, P.

Abstract

Improved outcomes in advanced stage uterine carcinosarcoma (mixed mullerian tumor [MMT])

D. M. O'Malley, C. Nagel, L. A. Cantrell, L. Havrilesky, M. Liotta, A. Alvarez Secord, A. Nickles, D. E. Cohn, A. Wallace, P. Rose and P. Gehrig

The James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

5518

Background: There is currently no consensus regarding the management of advanced stage uterine MMT. In an effort to better define postoperative treatment modalities and their associated outcomes, we retrospectively reviewed factors that influence progression and survival. Methods: A retrospective, multi-institution study of women diagnosed from 1997–2007 was performed. Post-operative treatment included either observation (OBS), RT (brachytherapy, whole pelvic, or combination), chemotherapy (CT) alone or with RT (CT+RT). The majority of chemotherapy regimens included carboplatinum/paclitaxel, Ifosfamide/cisplatin, cisplatin/adriamycin, Data collected included time to recurrence, overall survival and sites of recurrence. Statistics included t-test, ANOVA and Kaplan Meier. Results: 119 patients were identified with late stage uterine MMT. 81 had stage III disease and 38 had stage IV disease. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years (range: 30–86). 70 (59%) were Caucasian and 48 (40%) were African-American. 116 (87%) were optimally debulked and their survival further analyzed. 18 (15%) were observed and 9 of these patients recurred. This group had the poorest median progression free survival (PFS) of 3.4 months. The majority (N = 50, 49%) of late stage patients underwent adjuvant CT with a median PFS of 13.3 months and median OS of 15.6 months. Of these patients 33 (66%) recurred. 18 (17 %) patients underwent RT alone with a median PFS of 12.4 months and OS of 14.9 months. 14 (78%) of these patients recurred. 20 patients (19%) underwent a combination of CT and RT and 11 (55%) experienced recurrences . The combination therapy group had the longest median PFS of 14.3 months and OS of 17.2 months (p = 0.27). Conclusions: Chemotherapy had become the standard therapy for advanced stage MMT however the addition of radiation has not been established. Patients diagnosed with advanced stage MMT can achieve long-term DFS in a minority of patients (33%) treated with chemotherapy. We showed that the addition of radiation to adjuvant chemotherapy showed a slight improvement over chemotherapy alone yet the optimal therapy has yet to be defined. This retrospective review highlights the need for prospective trials of new therapeutic agents and treatment regimens for women with advanced stage uterine MMT.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online