Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 27, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2009: 5519
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Movva, S.
Right arrow Articles by Verschraegen, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Movva, S.
Right arrow Articles by Verschraegen, C. F.

Abstract

Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway in cervical cancer (CC) patients (pts)

S. Movva, H. Arias-Pulido, A. Chavez, N. Joste, L. Lomo, S. J. Lee and C. F. Verschraegen

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM

5519

Background: EGFR, a membrane tyrosine kinase receptor that regulates multiple functions such as cell growth, differentiation, gene expression and development through at least 3 pathways, is overexpressed in a wide variety of solid tumors, including CC. The downstream activation of the EGFR pathways has not been studied extensively. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation between EGFR-HER-2-HER-3-HER-4 status, downstream pathways (STAT 3, survivin, RAS) with pt characteristics, overall survival and recurrence free survival in pts diagnosed with invasive CC. Methods: Receptor expressions were assessed by immunohistochemistry on 80 pts from our clinic. Tumors were scored by percentage of cells stained multiplied by intensity for a score range of 0–300 by two pathologists. Median EGFR score was 140. Pts were categorized as low expressor (EGFR score lower than 140) or as high expressor (EGFR score greater than 140). Differences in receptor expression were compared using the Log-rank test for overall (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS) and by Chi-square analyses for the clinical parameters (age, stage, histology, and grade). Results: A total of 80 pts data was analyzed. Mean age of the sample was 48 years. 23% of pts had well differentiated tumors. 80% had squamous histology. 39% had stage IIB or higher. 25% died of cancer. By Log-rank test, standard prognostic factors (age, stage, grade, and histology) showed the expected differences in survival, confirming the validity of the sample. However there were no correlations between the clinical parameters, OS, or RFS with EGFR expression. Data on HER-2–3-4, STAT3, survivin and RAS will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Although no correlation has been found between clinical outcome and EGFR expression, EGFR inhibitors of the extracellular domain are expected to be useful for the treatment of CC that overexpress this receptor. These results will serve as baseline data needed to test cetuximab and other EGFR inhibitors in pts with CC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online