Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search/Browse Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 27, No 15S (May 20 Supplement), 2009: 5522
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oskay-Oezcelik, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sehouli, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oskay-Oezcelik, G.
Right arrow Articles by Sehouli, J.

Abstract

What do patients think about CA-125 monitoring in the follow-up? Results from a multicenter trial in 1,060 patients with ovarian cancer

G. Oskay-Oezcelik, A. du Bois, P. A. Fasching, S. Mahner, C. Liebrich, A. Glaβ, S. Schmidt-Wetze, L. Sepp, K. Münstedt, W. Lichtenegger and J. Sehouli

Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany; University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany; Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany; Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde, Berlin, Germany; Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany; University Hospital, Wien, Germany; University Hospital, Giessen, Germany

5522

Background: In the clinical day CA-125 monitoring is frequently used as a part of follow-up care for patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, the potential benefit of CA-125 controls in the absence clinical symptoms are still unclear.There is little known about the expectations and preferences of patients with OC. Therefore we have initiated a multi-institutional survey. Methods: A semi-structered consisting 15 questions was developed in a pilot-study of 20 patients. After this validation all gynecological departments and gynecological-oncological practices were invited to participate in this trial using an anonynomous print version of the questionaire Results: Between December 2006 and December 2007 a total of 1,060 patients were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range 16–87). 60% of the patients had primary ovarian cancer, 40% had relapsed ovarian cancer. Routine follow-up visits were mostly performed by gynaecologists in a gynaecological practice (56.9%) and in hospitals (49.5%). Patients were informed about the procedures and goals of cancer care predominantly after primary surgery (62.5%) and in 15.7% after last cycle of first-line chemotherapy. 7.7% declared that they were informed only at the first follow-up visit, 9.2% stated that they have never received any information about their cancer care management. According the patients opinion the main objective for the follow-up is the early detection of relapse and a prolongation of overall survival (95.8%). About more than 90% get CA-125 measurements. These were the procedures with highest anxiety but also the most important procedure for the patient. Finally, most patients (89%) were satisfied from their management of cancer care. Conclusions: The present study is the largest survey about cancer care so far and provides several important data for physician-patient communication concerning the follow-up management of patients OC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract presentation from the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting




About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online