Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition).
Vol 27, No 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2009: CRA8003
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology

This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Herbst, R. S. Articles by Johnson, B. E. PubMed Articles by Herbst, R. S. Articles by Johnson, B. E.

Abstract

Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZODIAC)

University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China; West German Tumor Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan; Tongji University, Shanghai, China; Beijing Institute for Cancer Research, Beijing, China; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

CRA8003

Background: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling. Addition of vandetanib to docetaxel (doc) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in a randomized phase II study in patients (pts) with previously treated NSCLC (Heymach et al, JCO, 2007). Methods: The primary objective was to determine whether vandetanib 100 mg/day + doc 75 mg/m² every 21 days (max 6 cycles) prolonged PFS vs placebo + doc. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), time to deterioration of symptoms (TDS) and safety. Efficacy and safety in females were assessed as a co-primary analysis population. Eligibility criteria included stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, PS 0–1, and previous first-line chemotherapy. Results: Between May 2006 and April 2008, 1,391 pts (mean age, 58 years; 30% female; 25% squamous; 10% brain mets) were randomized to vandetanib + doc (n=694) or placebo + doc (n=697). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median duration of follow-up was 12.8 months, with 87% patients progressed and 59% dead. Addition of vandetanib to doc showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs doc (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 97.58% CI 0.70–0.90; P<0.001), and a similar advantage in females (HR 0.79; P=0.024). Significant advantages for vandetanib + doc were also seen for ORR (17% vs 10%, P<0.001) and TDS (HR 0.78, P=0.002; FACT-L Lung Cancer Subscale). Overall survival showed a positive trend for vandetanib + doc that was not statistically significant (HR 0.91, 97.52% CI 0.78–1.07; P=0.196). The adverse event (AE) profile was consistent with that previously observed for vandetanib in NSCLC. Common AEs occurring more frequently in the vandetanib arm included diarrhea (42% vs 33%), rash (42% vs 24%) and neutropenia (32% vs 27%). Nausea (23% vs 32%), vomiting (16% vs 21%) and anemia (10% vs 15%) were less frequent in the vandetanib arm. The incidence of protocol-defined QTc prolongation was <2% in pts receiving vandetanib. Conclusions: The study met its primary objective of PFS prolongation with vandetanib + doc vs doc. Vandetanib is the first oral targeted therapy in phase III trials to show significant evidence of clinical benefit when added to standard chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Author Disclosure

Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration AstraZeneca Oncology AstraZeneca Oncology, Genzyme Takeda AstraZeneca Oncology AstraZeneca Oncology, Chugai, Taiho, Takeda, Wyeth Genzyme

Abstract presentation from the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting